Click here to preview the new Fast Company

Want to try out the new

If you’d like to return to the previous design, click the yellow button on the lower left corner.


The Sticky, Tricky Rebranding of Corn Syrup as "Corn Sugar"

Everyone's favorite isoglucose has a sweet new name.

[We're still awaiting comment from the creators of the ads. We'll update this post as soon as we hear anything.?Ed.]

Cast as an evil, oozing harbinger of obesity and diabetes, sales of high fructose corn syrup have seen a downward spiral as companies swap the over-processed sweetener for healthier-sounding ingredients. So what's the solution for the industry, according to the Corn Refiners Association? Change the name. To "corn sugar." And presto! What was once a scary sounding goo becomes more natural-sounding, just as sweet and pure as cane sugar.

A new Web site and campaign rebranding HFCS as the innocuous term was launched today in the hopes that they will get FDA approval to change the name on food labeling. Over at, ads and imagery of a maze mowed through corn fields symbolizes the path of misdirected customers confused by current labeling systems, as quotes from dietitians float helpfully above. (The Corn Refiners Association also own and the icky-sounding

[A brand-new ad, touting the subtle rebranding]

"This seems to be a last-ditch attempt to try and salvage a product that they know is not good for Americans," says Curt Ellis, one of the co-producers and stars of the 2007 documentary King Corn, as well as a Food and Society Fellow with the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. "They have lost some of their biggest customers as more industrial food companies are converting to table sugar or more natural ingredients than that. Companies are reducing the empty calories in their products." Indeed, Pepsi Throwback, is among the many products from big companies now marketing their use of real sugar.

In 2008, the Corn Refiners Association launched a similar campaign called Sweet Surprise, which featured an estimated $30 million spent in ads attempting to de-vilify HFCS, produced by the same team behind DDB and Ogilvy PR. A request out to DDB for comment from the creatives has not yet been returned, yet in the press release on the site, the reason given for the campaign is to help people make the right choices about their health. "As Americans grapple with an 'obesity epidemic,' [their quotes, not ours] well-renowned nutritionists question whether sweetener confusion could lead consumers to make misinformed decisions about sugars in their diets," says the statement.

[Another of the new "corn sugar" ads]

"I do see their point," says Ellis. "The term 'high fructose corn syrup' — although it was a name they chose at one point in time — is confusing." The term "corn sugar" appeals more to what Americans are currently looking for in food, he says. "We want real food, not highly-processed food products." But Ellis thinks that Americans will simply start looking for "corn sugar" on products as an ingredient to avoid. "I'm sorry to bust up their field of dreams, but American consumers are smart enough to know that 'corn sugar' is just a quaint new way of saying 'empty calories.'"

Not that table sugar isn't industrialized as well, notes Ellis — sugar is processed in factories and subject to various unnatural processes like bleaching. But the difference between the two is overwhelming, says Ellis, who actually made high fructose corn syrup as part of his film's plot. "If anyone made it themselves, you'd understand," he says. "We had to get genetically-modified enzymes, we had to use battery acid. It's not a pretty-looking process. It looked like a lab, not a kitchen."

As sweet as their spin sounds,'s health claims are actually valid. Pound-for-pound HFCS has similar dietary characteristics as table sugar and doesn't even have as much fructose as some fruit, a fact that's been confirmed by leading nutritionalists. Sugar is still sugar when it enters your body — although a recent Princeton study refutes that, claiming that rats fed HFCS gained more weight.

The real problem, says Ellis, is that HFCS is cheaper to produce than sugar, and therefore pumped into all sorts of over-processed, high-calorie foods as filler. These foods —which have been proven to cause obesity — then look more attractive to consumers due to their low prices. Thus supporting the manufacturers of HFCS is a vote of confidence for cheap, unhealthy food, grown by people who are paid by the government to produce acres of empty calories instead of produce, he says. "We're rewarding farmers who grow the ingredients to make it, yet we don't even produce enough fresh fruits and vegetables to satisfy the recommended daily amounts for our population," he says. "If the corn syrup industry really thinks we don't have anything to 'worry about,' they might've ended their commercial with a trip to the drive-through instead of a wholesome home-cooked meal where little of their trademark product is likely to be consumed."

[A spoof of the corn industry]

After the Sweet Surprise campaign, the Internet was soaked in parodies, including some from the producers of King Corn, who equated marketing HFCS to marketing cigarette smoking. In fact, Ellis says the name change reminds him of rebranding cigarettes something like "white sticks" so consumers would forget all the bad facts associated with them. "One in three American children is overweight or obese, in large part thanks to the diet of sweeteners we're rearing them on," says Ellis. "According to the CDC, one in three children born in the year 2000 is on track to develop Type II diabetes at some point — one in two among children of color." That's something that a name like "corn sugar" isn't going to change.

[Image by Muffet]

Add New Comment


  • WindyD

    Thanks Alissa for an informative article. If all sugars
    were the same, then people who are allergic to corn would not have reactions to
    high fructose corn syrup. As a health, biology, and chemistry teacher, I can
    attest that all sugars are certainly not the same--as the corn refiners and
    fast food propagandists like Consumer Freedom would like for you to believe.
    The body certainly does not digest all sugars in the same way. Even tiny differences
    at the "almost the same" level can make huge differences at the molecular
    level.  At the genetic level, one extra
    chromosome can completely change a human being.   One tiny microscopic non-living virus can infect, multiply, and
    kill thousands.   Synthetic, processed food is not the same as
    fresh, real food.  The body knows the
    difference—even if the corn refiners don’t.  

    The corn refiners and "Consumer Freedom"
    propagandists do not want the American people to be informed and wise about
    what is happening in the fast/processed food industry.  They want the American
    public for their fast food slaves--forcing unwanted additives down our throats
    to keep us addicted to their synthetic foods--even changing the names to make
    them more palatable.

    Does anyone believe that the corn refiner leaders (and the
    fast food folks at “Consumer Freedom”)  actually consume that artificial red
    drink (from the first corn refiner ads), and give it to their children?

    We need to love our children enough to feed them real
    foods—not highly processed, synthetic foods with “corn sugar.”  We are freer when we consume fresh real
    Thanks to writers like Alissa, real food freedom might
    some day be possible.


  • HFCS is bad

    HFCS is poison to the body.  Nobody should ingest it, and the government should not be subsidizing the corn industry.

    Plus, it's made from GMO corn which is also unhealthy.

  • ConsumerFreedom

    The name leads people to assume that the syrup is somehow high in fructose-- which it actually isn’t. Props for digging up the fact that “pound-for-pound HFCS has similar dietary characteristics as table sugar and doesn't even have as much fructose as some fruit, a fact that's been confirmed by leading nutritionalists [sic].” If only this were enough to get us all to stop freaking out about corn sugar. Obsessing about one part of one ingredient is not the way to leading healthier lives.

  • Alissa

    Troy, that is an amazing point and one that I was not aware of, but you're right! Too bad dextrose makers don't have a massive organization to combat the stealing of their name.

  • Troy Foster

    One problem here is that there is already a product called "corn sugar", and it is, in fact, corn sugar (sugar made from corn - dextrose). I use corn sugar for bottle conditioning beer, and the corn sugar, while processed like any refined sugar, does not go through the conversion processes that make HFCS the undesirable that it is.

    I think the sellers of real corn sugar should call foul on this move.