With the Form 1, Formlabs sought to build a 3-D printer for designers, by designers.

The problem, as they saw it, was one of quality: Existing affordable printers just couldn’t deliver the quality and consistency designers and engineers needed for rapid prototyping.

Unlike the Makerbot Replicator and other affordable, extrusion-based machines, the Form 1 uses a stereolithographic process for printing, hardening malleable resin with ultraviolet light.

Yoav Reches, the team’s lead industrial designer, said he wanted to build a machine that was at home in a workshop or on a designer’s desk.

The aluminum base makes the printer look more like a high-end kitchen appliance than a hobbyist machine.

Along with the printer comes a kit that helps keep the gooey post-processing as tidy as possible.

So far, the team says they’ve received an incredible response from all types of independent designers and engineers.

The Form 1 can print layers down to 25 microns tall, about 1/10,000th of an inch, and four times smaller than the Replicator 2's 100 micron layers.

The resin required by the stereolithographic technique is more expensive than the simple plastic used in extrusion-based machines, but Formlabs is promising customers at least 1 liter per month at $129.

Formlabs believes in the dream of desktop manufacturing, but giving designers access to affordable, professional-quality 3-D printing, they say, is a necessary step along the way.

Kickstarting: A 3-D Printer For Designers, By Designers

An affordable, high-quality 3-D printer offers another route to the desktop manufacturing revolution.

The cover of this month’s Wired magazine shows Makerbot’s founder, Bre Pettis, holding the Replicator 2, the company’s slick new 3-D printer. A few lines of accompanying text make a bold pronouncement: "This machine will change the world." The article itself hedges that bet a bit. The gist is that even if the Replicator 2 isn’t the 3-D printer that finds its way into the home of John Q. Public, its polished build and ease of use signal an important step toward that future. But if we’re being honest, your average person probably hasn’t even heard of 3-D printing, and if he has, he probably doesn’t have much of an idea what it could do for him. Unless, that is, that person happens to work in one of the many fields in which rapid prototyping is an increasingly indispensable part of the design process. These are the people that Formlabs, a new outfit started by an alum from MIT’s Media Lab, is targeting with their first piece of hardware, the Form 1. Essentially, it’s a 3-D printer for designers, by designers.

The dream, for those at Makerbot and Formlabs alike, is that rapid manufacturing will someday offer a viable alternative to mass-production. Instead of buying an iPhone case from a company’s website and having it shipped to me, I’ll be able to look at a virtual library of designs and print my own, right from home. Yoav Reches, the lead industrial designer at Formlabs, told me that this dream is definitely one his team believes in, but at this point, they’re more concerned with the role 3-D printing can play in the design process. "I think the main focus," Reches says, "is research and development. [With 3-D printing] you can change a measurement; you can allow yourself to think in small numbers; you don’t have to commit to molds—it’s kind of heaven, in terms of design." Basically, the Form 1 is intended not for the person who wants to print their own iPhone case but for the independent designer who’s making one.

To offer a more concrete example, Cranor explained how having a 3-D printer in the office helped as they were developing the Form 1 itself. "We were able to make tweaks to the prototypes really quickly. Because it’s like, 'Oh, we want to try out a new servo motor. Should we go to the machine shop and spend a bunch of time measuring and drilling and cutting and milling if we just want to be able to mount this new motor to our device?' No, we didn’t do that, we had an intern look at the data sheet of the servo, quickly CAD up a little mount, and then we 3-D printed it and bolted it onto the device." Up until now, there wasn’t really a 3-D printer designed specifically with this type of rapid prototyping in mind.

The issue, members of the Formlabs team explained to me, is one of quality. For years, there has been a huge gulf between the results you can get from a professional-quality 3-D printer (which can cost $10,000 and up) and the more affordable hobbyist machines like the original Makerbot. The latter were sufficient for curious early adopters and tinker-happy makers, but they couldn’t really deliver the resolution and reliability designers often needed in the prototyping process. "We’re a company of designers and engineers ourselves," David Cranor, one of Formlabs’ founders explained to me, "and there just wasn’t anything out there for us that would do what we needed to do at the price point we needed. So we all got together and decided to make our own dream 3-D printer." And what kind of qualities does an independent designer’s dream 3-D printer have? Resolution, reliability, and repeatability. Basically, high-end results at a low-end price tag.

The central difference between the Form 1, which Formlabs is selling for $2,700, and other relatively affordable 3-D printers is the method they employ for printing. The Replicator 2 and others are extrusion-based machines, in which heated plastic is laid down layer by layer. The Form 1 uses the stereolithographic approach found in higher-end printers, where malleable material is hardened by exposure to certain wavelengths of ultraviolet light. Using stereolithography, the Form 1 can print layers down to 25 microns tall, about 1/1,000th of an inch, and four times smaller than the Replicator 2's 100 micron layers. The UV-hardening resin is significantly more expensive than the simple plastics used by the extrusion machines, but Formlabs is guaranteeing customers at least 1 liter of resin per month at $129 for the lifetime of the machine, and Cranor tells me they’re now working on developing "a huge palette of materials" to work with the printer.

The Form 1's distinction as a different type of 3-D printer—one intended to fill the gap between the hobbyist printers and ultra-expensive professional models—is evident in the look of the machine itself; its clean aluminum base makes it look more like a high-end kitchen appliance than a DIY machine. But not all designers are gear heads at heart, and the Form 1 was constructed with this in mind. Reches told me the team took great pains to make the printing process as simple as possible, from the straightforward software the team developed to the post-processing tools included in the package, intended to help people manage the somewhat messy stereolithographic process. In his 15 years in the field, Reches explained, he found that studios were often divided into "the dirty area" and "the clean area"—one side "dusty" and "full of chemicals" and the other kept tidy for computers and paper work. With the Form 1, he says, "I think we managed to cross this boundary."

The independent designers and engineers of the world seem to agree. In just a week and change, more than 1,000 people have pledged $1.5 million to the project on Kickstarter, essentially amounting to nearly 500 preorders for the machine. We might still be a ways off from buying 3-D printers at Walmart and printing iPhone cases (or, by that time, Google Glasses croakies) in our homes, but the enthusiasm the Form 1 has been met with shows that there is a demand for the technology right now. "3-D printing that everyone has access to on their kitchen table is definitely something that’s going to happen in the future," Cranor told me. "But there are a few steps that need to happen before that."

You can read more about the Form 1 on its Kickstarter page.

Add New Comment


  • xavier@protoseyewear.com

    I've noticed that you've written about Kickstarter campaigns and just thought that you might be interested in ours.

    We are launching our very own crowdfunding campaign for our company, Protos Eyewear, to crowdfund custom fit eyewear made via 3D printing.

    Unfortunately, Kickstarter no longer allows eyewear, so we have to work extra hard to get the word out. We would love to get your help and support in any way, shape or form. If you would like to write about our compelling project, then please do check us out at: protoseyewear.com

    We would be forever grateful if you can share our project with your readers, friends, or whoever you think would be interested, as we prepare for our launch!

    If you have any inquiries or concerns regarding our campaign, please feel free to contact us at team@protoseyewear.com

  • Laura

    Is there any concern about a new proliferation of plastic waste, especially if 3D printers really do make their way into our homes?

  • Trent Siddharta

     Definitely there is a concern on yet more waste, bio plant resin seems a more friendly choice. "The economy don't seem very economical anymore Mom!"

  • Char

    Yeah, I agree. I would be much more interested in a 3D printer if someone came up with a less wasteful substance to use with it instead of plastic.

  • redmeatgood

    Looks Killer! Looks like a 3D printer should look like. Maybe the orange helps with the contrast (like shooting glasses) in the box to accent the detail on the printout while the machine is working. As for the rounded corners, corners tend to stick out and get bumped, I usually take them away when not needed. Good job MIT people. I hope its USA made.

  • Steve

    The orange color is due to filtering the UV laser that is used in the stereolithography process....

  • Simone

    But... It's so ugly! The orange and the aluminum part don't fit together in shape. The rounded corners where the parts meet make it seem as if they shouldn't fit together at all. Make the adjoining corners straight, and then it will be a little better...

  • Simone

    I understand what you mean, Dijtr. However, I do feel that you confuse contemporary with some kind of web 2.0 feel, or perhaps an Apple-sauce. Looking at the link you provided; I do get why it is done like this, but to say that I find it aesthetically pleasing, innovative and contemporary... No. The retro feel is very apparent indeed, and that part of the implementation I like. 
    But of course, I am only one designer and there's probably a whole world that sees things differently!

  • Dijtr

    I don't know Simone. It looks fine; I'm not sure why the orange colored top container was chosen. A blue tint similar to the LED display will probably wok better. As for the curve I think it adds a contemporary feel to it and retro: http://www.stufficreate.com/sh...