Current Issue
This Month's Print Issue

Follow Fast Company

We’ll come to you.

2 minute read

Infographic of the Day

Infographic: The 9,595 Americans Killed By Guns In 2010

How do you depict the 400,000 years of life lost to guns annually? Not by aggregating, but by showing each life as a discrete line.

  • <p>This visualization by Periscopic imagines the gun murders of 2010 as 9,595 individual stories.</p>
  • <p>Each starts as an arc of orange or yellow.</p>
  • <p>When a life is cut short, the dot falls to the bottom of the graph, and continues on as a faint grey line.</p>
  • <p>The animation continues until …</p>
  • <p>… you’re inundated with thousands of deaths in a matter of moments.</p>
  • <p>Again, each line is its own life--and almost 10,000 lines are drawn on the page you see.</p>
  • <p>The effect is staggering.</p>
  • <p>After the visual completes, you’re free to explore the data further.</p>
  • <p>Toggle several tags to dig through the data in more ways. It’s a really respectful, individualized way to explore a horrible topic.</p>
  • 01 /09

    This visualization by Periscopic imagines the gun murders of 2010 as 9,595 individual stories.

  • 02 /09

    Each starts as an arc of orange or yellow.

  • 03 /09

    When a life is cut short, the dot falls to the bottom of the graph, and continues on as a faint grey line.

  • 04 /09

    The animation continues until …

  • 05 /09

    … you’re inundated with thousands of deaths in a matter of moments.

  • 06 /09

    Again, each line is its own life--and almost 10,000 lines are drawn on the page you see.

  • 07 /09

    The effect is staggering.

  • 08 /09

    After the visual completes, you’re free to explore the data further.

  • 09 /09

    Toggle several tags to dig through the data in more ways. It’s a really respectful, individualized way to explore a horrible topic.

Lately, there’s a lot of talk on assault rifle bans, and whether it’s an individual’s constitutional right to own a weapon capable of slaughtering a room full of people in moments. And as important as all of that debate may be, I can’t help but wonder if we’re missing the larger point: 69% of gun murders are from easily concealed handguns.

It’s one of many thoughts that rushes through my head while watching this infographic on U.S. gun murders in 2010. Created by Kim Rees and Dino Citraro from Periscopic, the stark animation traces every single one of the 9,595 lives lost to gun murders that year. It’s as much a memorial as anything else.

"We’re hoping that people will see these individual victims," the team tells Co.Design. "We’re not looking at aggregate numbers. We’re not trying to analyze this data. This data was living and breathing, and has now been extinguished. We’re hoping to keep their flames living on in the hearts of others."

That word "flame" plays out literally. A black background is cut with a burning orange or yellow arc of light (a person’s life). Upon death, they fall from the sky, and a "ghost lift" line finishes their trajectory. It’s absolutely cutting to look at, especially after a few moments, when the graphic just inundates you with lost life—what adds up to 400,000 years of living, taken by bullets.

"The idea of using arcs is to harken to the nature of life—a birth, growth, an apex, a waning, and finally death," the team explains. "Above all, we wanted to respect the individual victims of these crimes. The focus was on the huge potential that was lost—babies who would have grown old, kids entering college who had so many things left to do in the world."

Once the visualization is complete, the user is free to click through the data to explore more. A particularly smart toggle will show you a stat mirrored by its complement. So while you see that 10 20-year-old women were murdered by guns in 2010, and that number seems so small, it’s presented with a data shadow of the 420 men who were killed by guns in that same age range. Through data design alone, it’s inherently impossible to look at the bright side. The context reminds us that there isn’t and will never be a good way to spin these numbers.

See it here.

[Image: Holes via Shutterstock]