Originally published in 1931, John B. Sparks’ Histomap is a fantastic infographic even eighty years later.

The Histomap traces the history of world civilizations through 4,000 years.

The chart’s a little out of touch, in that it groups cultures into "peoples", which is a concept that is pretty out of date. But it’s still awesome design.

As the years pass, civilizations rise and fall, wax and wane.

For every fifty year segment of history, the Histomap gives an outline of key historical events.

One thing that really stands out on the Histomap is how steady China’s influence in the world has been.

The Histomap does miss some cultures and civilizations, but it’s a product of the historical perspective of the time.

The Histomap was published during a time when charts encapsulating the sum knowledge of an entire field were extremely popular.

Sparks’ Histomap is a perfect example of how, even the better part of a century ago, designers were using infographics.

Sparks didn’t stop at the Histomap of Human Civilization. Unbelievably, he created an even more epic Histomap of Evolution. If

The Histomap stops in the early 20th Century. Even if you filled the rest in, it would only grow by less than an inch.

Imagine what the Histomap will look like in another 4,000 years!

Infographic: 4,000 Years Of Human History Captured In One Retro Chart

In 1931, John B. Sparks distilled human civilization into a single chart. Even today, it’s great infographic design.

If time is a river, the Histomap, created by John B. Sparks and first published by Rand McNally back in 1931, is a raging Mississippi. In that massive river of time, each of humanity’s great civilizations becomes a confluence that ebbs, wanes, and sometimes ebbs again, each a separate current in a river that inexorably rages down to the mouth of the present day.

Although certainly not modern, the Histomap is still a breathtaking example of good infographic design: A five-foot, roll-up chart that can fit an overview of human history on any wall. Starting in 2000 B.C. with seven different civilizations—the Aegeans, the Egyptians, the Hittites, the Amorites, the Iranians, the Indians, the Huns, and the Chinese—you travel forward or backward in time as your eyes move up or down 0.75 inches. Some civilizations bleed together, others are swallowed up; some surge, others crash.

While the X-axis indicates time in Sparks’ Histomap, the Y-axis appears to indicate the size of each empire. Although time is a remarkably objective data point for this kind of infographic, and so the length of each civilization’s journey section of the Histomap is easy to interpret, it’s less clear exactly what Sparks was trying to say with each civilization’s waxing and waning width. Is the girth of a civilization determined by the number of its subjects? Its geopolitical influence? Its sheer sprawl across the globe? The size of its military? Its contribution to the arts and sciences? Its wealth? Unfortunately, Sparks isn’t around anymore to tell us.

From a modern perspective, Sparks’ Histomap will raise a few eyebrows. For one, it subscribes to an outdated (but, at the time, quite in vogue) idea about how different cultures throughout history could be grouped into various "peoples." The chart also underestimates or omits certain cultures that historians at the time didn’t truly appreciate the importance of. The chart is also more Eurocentric than it would be if it were created today, with little space devoted to African civilizations or even American civilizations before Europeans settled the New World in the 15th century.

As a look at what historians at the time thought about the course of history, though, it’s easy to forgive Sparks’ Histomap for not being ahead of its time. It’s a laudable achievement. According to Rebecca Onion over at Slate, in the 1920s and 1930s, charts that even a layman could understand which tried to encapsulate huge schools of knowledge (like philosophy, history, medicine, science, and physics) were extremely popular. Sparks’ Histomap is a perfect example of how, even the better part of a century ago, designers were using infographics to make complicated, head-dizzying data sets not just relatable but intimately familiar to everyone, no matter what their educational background.

Sparks didn’t stop at the Histomap of Human Civilization. Unbelievably, he created an even more epic Histomap of Evolution. If you think watching civilizations try to squeeze each other out of the picture over the course of 4,000 years is epic, imagine when that battle of survival is waged between different species over the course of hundreds of billions of years.

You can learn more about John B. Sparks’ Histomap here.

Add New Comment

13 Comments

  • J V

    It's a beautiful and fun! 
    Despite this, I think in this map is not good balanced.
    For example, in sXVI and sXVII  Spain was the most powerful country in the world. Chinese's civilization probably have had a biggest influence in their zone also pre-columbus civilization in central and south america have had lot of power in their zone.
    I think is an anglosaxon view of the world history.

  • Doyle Buehler

    It's amazing how many "micro-empires" exist now, as opposed to 2000BC.

    Doyle Buehler

  • Leigh-Ann Thomas

    Nice looking chart but what I'm wondering is: doesn't Africa feature in the evolution of humankind?

  • Doyle Buehler

    Good point. My understanding is that it's not geographical based... it's geopolitical.

  • Eric R Kuhne

    The graphic display of COINCIDENT CIVILIZATIONS is its chief virtue. While we may argue about the 'proportion' of civilizations at any one point in time, the timeline shows WHAT WAS GOING ON WHEN. Hugely important. We are working on five continents ... and the universal complaint is that the 'West' does not dignify any culture but its own. Sparks graphic simplification of an impossibly large collection of information is brilliant on every level (despite the quibbling). Eric R Kuhne

  • Gabe Morton-Cook

    Another small but important editorial note: In addition to the axes being flipped as mentioned below, you have the wrong timespan on the Evolutionary timeline. The earth is about 4.5 billion years old, and life has been evolving for less than a billion of that. 'Hundreds of millions' of years would be more accurate than 'hundreds of billions'.

  • Crispy75

    There's a modern version (which I think is excellent) available here: http://www.oxfordcartographers...

    It shows migrations and invasions with swooping arrows (look at those Mongols go!) and is divided into many more discrete "nations". Individual battles and conquests are marked, as are significant cultural events (invention of agriculture, writing, industry etc.). I have it on the wall in the downstairs bathroom and guests often linger too long in there!

  • disqus_A1KWTfnqry

    Also...this map (and the unbelievably dense Histomap of Evolution you refer to) come from a time when teachers and students were encouraged to take deep dives into data at one swipe.  Quite different from today, when the proliferation of data points across the Web encourages a piece here, a piece there.  You need to sink into the Histomap to "get" it -- we're more comfortable, these days, with plucking out the ideas or facts we need from a sea of data.

  • Ned Hancock

    You got your axes flipped: The y-axis (delineating horizontal lines) indicated time while x-axis (which nominally delineates vertical lines, though not so much in Sparks' maps) provides a measure of empire's magnitude.