The graph explores Super Bowl ad purchases at three levels: overall, industry-wide, and individual companies. The overall analysis shows that the big names who pony up for commercials every year have actually changed quite a bit over time.

Because the graph lacks a y-axis, those numbers would be nice to have at the overall and industry level as well. As it stands now, the user has to add up all of the bars in a given year to see how much was spent in total.

Clicking a stream at the industry level zooms in on individual companies, with their Super Bowl ad spending floating above the each year’s bar.

Infographic: Who Spends The Most On Super Bowl Ads?

This year, companies will spend about $25 per viewer for a 30-second ad. An interactive graphic shows which companies are buying.

Super Bowl ads have now become a media event themselves, with ads to tease the ads, monthlong rollouts and relentless media coverage (including, you know, this story). A new Wall Street Journal interactive breaks down everything you could want to know about which advertisers are paying for their stab at everlasting, 30-second glory.

The graph explores Super Bowl ad purchases at three levels: overall, industry-wide, and individual companies. The overall analysis shows that the big names who pony up for commercials every year have actually changed quite a bit over time. Sure, beverage ads for Pepsi and Budweiser have been part of Super Bowl Sunday for years. But the automotive industry has come from spending a mere $8 million in 2000 to a whopping $96 million in 2013, taking the trophy for the highest spending industry group. Seeing the obscene numbers Chrysler paid Clint Eastwood to give a two minute pep talk to America feels like a fun, voyeuristic snapshot inside the insane media buys of American corporations.

Clicking a stream at the industry level zooms in on individual companies, with their Super Bowl ad spending floating above each year’s bar. Because the graph lacks a y-axis, those numbers would be nice to have at the overall and industry level as well. As it stands now, the user has to add up all of the bars in a given year to see how much was spent in total. One also wishes the graph sat on a baseline x-axis instead of floating symmetrically. The bottom half of the streams is a redundant mirror of the top half’s peaks and valleys. Streamgraphs have their place, but in this case there’s no reason the Journal couldn’t have used a stacked area chart, which would have been easier to read.

Smaller design affordances help make up for any UI problems. Trends sit above the graph, giving users a place to start if they arrive at the page uninterested. As you go deeper into the graphic, a series of breadcrumbs appear to tell users what they’re looking at and how they can return to a previous view. Details on each year’s game sit below the chart, along with links to memorable ads from each year.

The Journal’s chart shows an overall increase in spending that starts to look like an arms race. No price is too high for that final grab at our attention when a half-minute spot now costs more than $4 million. All of this for us, despite the fact that research shows 80% of Super Bowl ads don’t even seem to work.

Add New Comment

0 Comments